Opportunities

Content Decay

Content Decay catches pages that used to perform well in organic search but have quietly slid down. Most decay isn't a single dramatic crash — it's a slow erosion as fresher competitors out-rank stale content. This report compares each URL's current reporting window against the immediately preceding window of the same length, and lists every page that lost 20% or more of its clicks or impressions — ordered by the steepest click decline, so you know exactly which pieces deserve a refresh next.

What it measures

  • Page Type — the URL's classification from your page-type rules.
  • URL — the page being measured.
  • Clicks (Current) and Clicks (Prev) — total clicks in the selected window, and in the equal-length window immediately before it.
  • Click Δ% — the percentage change between those two numbers. This is the column the report sorts on, steepest decline first.
  • Impr. (Current), Impr. (Prev) and Impr. Δ% — the same comparison for impressions. A page can qualify on impressions alone, which usually means lost visibility rather than lost clicks.

How we compute it

  1. We take your selected reporting window (30 days by default) and sum each URL's clicks and impressions within it — the current numbers.
  2. We do the same for the previous window: the same number of days, ending the day before your window starts.
  3. A URL is only considered if it had both clicks and impressions in the previous window — a page cannot decay from nothing.
  4. A URL appears in the report when clicks < previous × 0.8 or impressions < previous × 0.8 — i.e. either measure fell by at least 20%.
  5. Results are sorted ascending by click change, so the steepest declines float to the top.

Note that this is a period-over-period comparison, not a comparison against an all-time peak. Change the reporting window and both halves of the comparison move with it.

Scenarios you'll see

Stale evergreen

A how-to or guide page that ranked for years and is slowly being replaced by fresher SERP results. Refresh: update statistics, screenshots, examples, and re-publish with a new dateModified.

Time-sensitive news

An article tied to an event ("X review 2024") whose moment has passed. Often safe to leave decayed; if you're refreshing, change the slug and add a canonical from the old URL.

Cannibalised page

Decay started right after you published a similar new page. The new page is winning the query. Open Cannibalization, decide on a canonical, and consolidate.

Technical regression

Recent template change broke schema, increased LCP, or dropped internal links. Cross-check with PSI History and Index Coverage to confirm.

AI-overview cannibalisation

Page still ranks but Google is summarising the answer above the blue links. Impressions hold, clicks fall — confirm via the CTR Curve for that position.

Removed / 404

Page deleted or moved without a redirect. Recent clicks are zero, ratio is 0%. Either restore + 301-redirect or accept the loss; check Index Coverage for "Not found (404)" entries.

What to do with it

  1. Open the URL and audit it: are facts, prices, dates, screenshots, code samples still current?
  2. Compare your page to the current top-3 results for its primary query — what do they cover that you don't?
  3. Update content, expand thin sections, add an FAQ block, refresh internal links pointing to the page from your high-authority hubs.
  4. Update dateModified in your schema and request reindexing in Search Console.
  5. Re-check the click change after 4–8 weeks; meaningful refreshes usually rebound 30–80% of the lost clicks.

Caveats & limits

  • This compares two adjacent windows, so a one-off spike in the previous window makes the current one look like decay. Eyeball the trend before reacting.
  • Seasonal pages will look decayed heading into their off-season — the comparison has no concept of seasonality. Verify against YoY Dashboard before refreshing.
  • Brand-new pages that launched during the previous window can show a decline simply because that window caught their launch burst.
  • A short reporting window makes the report noisier, because both halves are short. Widen the window if too many pages qualify on small absolute numbers.
  • Qualifying on impressions only is not necessarily a content problem — it usually means the page is being shown less often, which points at rankings or SERP changes rather than the page itself.

Related reports

  • Top Pages — for the absolute click leaders.
  • Falling Pages — the same period-over-period comparison without the 20% threshold, so it also shows smaller movements and gains.
  • Cannibalization — to spot self-inflicted decay.
  • YoY Dashboard — for seasonal context.