Site Section Contribution
Site Section Contribution shows how each logical section of your site contributes to your overall search performance — clicks, impressions, CTR and average position split across the page-groups you've defined for this site (e.g. /blog/, /products/, /docs/, /pricing/). Site sections are the level most product owners actually think in. This is the report that turns "we got 50,000 clicks last month" into "blog drove 60% of that, the product pages drove 25%, and pricing drove almost all of the conversions".
What it measures
- Section — the page-group label you configured (top-level path or pattern).
- Clicks / Impressions — totals per section over the selected window.
- CTR — section-level click-through rate (window total).
- Average position — impression-weighted, per section.
- Period-over-period delta when a comparison range is selected.
How we compute it
- Each URL on your site is matched to a section using the page-group rules you've configured (under Manage Site → Page Groups). A URL belongs to exactly one section.
- For each section we sum clicks and impressions across all matching URLs over the selected window, recompute CTR as a window total, and compute the impression-weighted average position.
- URLs that don't match any defined section are bucketed as Unassigned so nothing is lost from the totals.
Scenarios you'll see
Clicks distributed across multiple sections — content + product + commercial pages all contributing. Resilient SEO posture; one section's wobble doesn't tank the whole site.
One section drives 70%+ of clicks. Common with content-heavy sites but creates fragility — that section's algorithm impact is the whole site's impact.
Pricing or product pages contribute little to organic clicks even though they're the conversion engine. Internal-link audit and dedicated commercial content are the typical fixes.
A section's clicks growing > 50% PoP while others are flat. Confirms where investment is paying off. Replicate the pattern in adjacent sections.
A section's clicks fall while the rest holds. Localised problem — content quality, technical regression, or category-level intent shift. Drill into Top Pages within the section.
Section A averages position 6; section B averages position 18. Either an authority gap to close (A is "better understood") or a strategic gap (you don't have enough content depth in section B yet).
What to do with it
- Configure your page groups deliberately — this report is only as useful as your section definitions. Cover blog, product, docs, pricing, support, etc.
- Use the section split when reporting to stakeholders. "Organic up 12%" is far more powerful as "Blog up 22%, Product flat, Pricing up 8%".
- Compare sections on CTR and position, not just clicks — they reveal which sections have room to grow vs which are already running near-optimally.
Caveats & limits
- Page-group rules are matched by URL pattern; URLs that don't match any rule fall into Unassigned. A growing Unassigned bucket is a sign your rules need updating.
- Position numbers across sections are not directly comparable — different competitor sets, different SERP layouts. Trust each section's trajectory more than cross-section absolutes.
Related reports
- Top Pages — drill from a section into its individual URLs.
- Traffic Trend — overall trend you’re decomposing here.
- Winners and Losers — to find the URL-level drivers behind a section move.